Interactive Comparison Tool

Tickmill vs XM (2026): Which Broker Is Better?

Compare fees, spreads, minimum deposits, platforms and regulatory information side by side. Conditions vary by country and legal entity.

Data last verified 2026-10-29Sources and verificationHow we compare brokers

Quick verdict

Tickmill and XM share the top Brokeradar score

Both score 4.6/5, so the better choice depends on your account type, deposit and country. Use the key differences below to decide.

Tickmill and XM share a 4.6 Brokeradar score, so this comparison comes down to how you trade rather than an overall winner. Tickmill is built around a $100 Raw account at 0.0 pips plus $6 round turn, with FCA authorisation in the UK. XM is built around commission-free accounts from $5, with a group that includes CySEC, ASIC and DFSA licences.

Comparing 2 brokers

Tickmill
Editorial score
★ 4.6 / 5
Min Deposit
$100
Spreads From
0.0 pips
Max Leverage
Up to 1:1000
Regulation
FCA, CySEC, FSCA, FSA Seychelles, DFSA UAE
Platforms
MT4, MT5, Tickmill Trader, TradingView
Islamic Accounts
Yes, Swap-Free
Established Year
2015
Data last verified
2026-10-29
XM
Editorial score
★ 4.6 / 5
Min Deposit
$5
Spreads From
0.8 pips
Max Leverage
Up to 1:1000
Regulation
CySEC, FSC Belize, ASIC, DFSA UAE, FSCA South Africa, FSA Seychelles, FSC Mauritius, CMA Kenya
Platforms
MT4, MT5, XM App
Islamic Accounts
Yes, Swap-Free
Established Year
2009
Data last verified
2026-10-29

Tickmill vs XM: key differences

Calculated from the recorded data for each broker. The account type and legal entity you are onboarded by can change these figures.

  • Lower minimum deposit

    Advantage: XM

    Tickmill
    $100
    XM
    $5
  • Higher maximum leverage

    Level across the compared brokers.

    Tickmill
    Up to 1:1000
    XM
    Up to 1:1000
  • Platforms only one broker offers

    Platforms available at only one of the compared brokers.

    Tickmill
    Tickmill Trader, TradingView
    XM
    XM App
  • Licences only one broker holds

    Regulators that appear for only one of the compared brands.

    Tickmill
    FCA, FSCA
    XM
    FSC Belize, ASIC, FSCA South Africa, FSC Mauritius, CMA Kenya
  • Longer track record

    Advantage: XM

    Tickmill
    2015
    XM
    2009

Tickmill vs XM: fees and spreads

Tickmill trading costs

Published spreads start from 0.0 pips. The minimum deposit recorded is $100. Raw and standard accounts can use different spread and commission models, so compare the account-level schedule before funding.

XM trading costs

Published spreads start from 0.8 pips. The minimum deposit recorded is $5. Raw and standard accounts can use different spread and commission models, so compare the account-level schedule before funding.

Regulation and country availability

A broker brand can serve customers through multiple legal entities. Licenses, leverage limits and compensation arrangements may therefore differ between two customers using the same brand.

Tickmill

Licenses recorded: FCA, CySEC, FSCA, FSA Seychelles, DFSA UAE.

Review Tickmill safety details

XM

Licenses recorded: CySEC, FSC Belize, ASIC, DFSA UAE, FSCA South Africa, FSA Seychelles, FSC Mauritius, CMA Kenya.

Review XM safety details

Tickmill vs XM: category-by-category winners

Last checked 2026-10-29

Spread-only account cost

Winner: XM

XM advertises commission-free spreads as low as 0.8 pips against 1.6 pips on Tickmill Classic. Neither charges commission on these accounts.

Raw-pricing access

Winner: Tickmill

Tickmill Raw is 0.0 pips plus $3 per side ($6 round turn) from $100. XM does not offer a commission-based raw account.

Regulation and safety by entity

Winner: Tie

Tickmill holds FCA (FSCS cover for eligible UK clients), CySEC, FSCA and FSA Seychelles licences. XM holds CySEC, ASIC, DFSA, FSC Belize, FSA Seychelles and CMA Kenya licences. A UK trader will usually prefer Tickmill's FCA entity and an Australian trader XM's ASIC entity. International clients of both are onboarded offshore.

Account minimums

Winner: XM

XM starts at $5 against $100 at Tickmill.

Scalping and EA suitability

Winner: Tickmill

A raw spread with a fixed per-lot commission suits high-frequency strategies better than a wider all-in spread, and Tickmill records a 150 ms execution figure. XM permits scalping but has no raw account.

Which broker should you choose?

Last checked 2026-10-29

Choose Tickmill if…

  • You trade often and want raw spreads with a $6 round-turn commission.
  • You are UK-based and want an FCA-authorised counterparty.
  • You can fund $100 or more.

Choose XM if…

  • You want to start with $5 and commission-free pricing.
  • You are in Australia or the UAE and want XM's local licence.
  • You value structured education on a first account.

Final verdict: Tickmill vs XM

Last checked 2026-10-29

The scores are level. Choose Tickmill if you will trade actively enough for raw pricing to pay off, or if you want FCA protection in the UK. Choose XM if you are starting small, prefer commission-free pricing, or are onboarded through XM's ASIC or DFSA entity. Both charge an inactivity fee after three months without trading.

Tickmill vs XM: frequently asked questions

Last checked 2026-10-29

Is Tickmill or XM cheaper?

It depends on the account. On a raw account, Tickmill costs 0.0 pips plus $6 round turn, and XM has no equivalent. On commission-free accounts, XM's advertised 0.8-pip floor is tighter than Tickmill Classic's 1.6 pips.

Which broker has the higher Brokeradar score?

Neither. Both score 4.6/5, so the decision depends on account type, deposit size and the entity available to you.

Do Tickmill and XM charge inactivity fees?

Yes. Both record an inactivity fee after three months without trading. Check the current amount on each broker's fee page.

Sources and verification

Last checked 2026-10-29

Figures on this page come from the Brokeradar dataset and should be verified against the official broker pages and regulator registers below before you fund an account. Entity, leverage and fee schedules change and vary by country.

How we compare brokers